Free Shipping on Most Orders
Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light

Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 telephoto zoom lens has been a long time coming — rumors of its arrival started popping up a couple of years ago. Now it's finally here, and I snagged one for a weekend to put it through its paces.

The lens comes with a petal-shaped hood, a removable tripod mount, and a padded case. One small detail is worth noting: the Tamron lens cap is the "pinch style" cap where you grab its tabs in the middle of the cap, rather than on the outside. This means you can leave the hood on all day and still get the cap on and off easily. The normal style of lens cap makes that impossible because there is no clearance between your fingers and the sides of the lens hood. Smooth move, Tamron!.

The lens is a big one, much bigger (and better built) than entry-level zooms. Focusing is done internally, so the lens does not extend while zooming or focusing. The large front element does not rotate — good if you're using filters.

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 with hood
The Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 zoom lens with its included hood.

The main thing (other than the size and build) that distinguishes the Tamron from its entry-level brethren is its large maximum aperture. Most "beginner" zoom lenses in the 70-200mm ballpark can open up only to f/4-5.6 or so, meaning they let in less light than the Tamron's constant f/2.8.

Where this can hurt you is at 200mm when you're shooting without a tripod or a monopod — less light hitting the sensor means the shutter has to stay open longer, and at 200mm camera shake is visible through the viewfinder. So in order to get a sharp picture, you'd have to pump up the ISO setting to achieve a faster shutter speed and minimize blur. But doing so comes at the expense of picture quality, since the appearance of grain increases with your ISO setting.

Handheld at ISO 3200
Since the lens has a wide max aperture of f/2.8 across the entire
zoom range, it is possible to use it indoors using available light.

The Tamron opens up to f/2.8 across the zoom range, so you can get some great hand-held shots that are impossible with slower zooms, including lower-light or indoor shots. I found myself shooting without my monopod more and more as the weekend progressed. It's a workout to shoot with this lens hand-held for an entire afternoon, but the results are worth it.

Focusing on my Canon 40D was accurate and reasonably fast. I was able to get some good action shots at a youth baseball game where nobody's ever standing still.

Safe at third
Safe at third! The throw went into left field, but this handheld sports shot is nice & crisp.

It's worth noting a couple of mechanical differences between Tamron zoom lenses and Canon zoom lenses. I find that there is no perfect piece of camera gear, that any piece of equipment requires some user adjustment. So that's why these differences seem pretty minor. But here they are:

  • First, Tamron uses a "clutch mechanism" to change from auto to manual focus. You just grab the focus ring and pull it toward you. You can feel it slide into place, much like changing gears in a car, and you're free to focus manually. Manual focus on the 70-200mm is touchy — a quarter turn covers the whole range, so when you're honing in on a flower or something, very slight twists are required to achieve perfect focus. It's no big deal to me, because I use autofocus 99% of the time, anyway.
  • Second, the zoom ring twists in the opposite direction as Canon zooms. I got used to this in 20 seconds. 

The lens is sharp, too. Stopping down (or closing) the aperture makes it even sharper — by f/4 it's extremely sharp. But the reason I like an f/2.8 zoom is because I can shoot it wide open without a tripod in fading light, and it's plenty sharp enough at f/2.8. Sharpness has more to do with your technique than your lens, anyway.

Graveyard flowers
The lens' large maximum aperture is great at the end of the day when light begins to fade. Out
in bright sunlight you wouldn't shoot at f/2.8.

Another nice thing about f/2.8 on a zoom lens is that you can achieve a shallower depth of field, blurring out distracting background elements and making your subject stand out. The Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 is well-constructed, and renders the bokeh (blurry background) very well.

Statues
Blurring the background lets you bring your subject into focus.

This is an excellent step-up for the photographer who is looking for sharper telephoto shots, and it's great for someone interested in shooting sports or wildlife. It works well, is built with durability in mind, and most importantly, will help you take great photographs.

Moon
A tripod was necessary for this tightly-cropped moon shot.

snake
Good thing I was able to step back from this one.

 


Posted Tue, Jun 24 2008 9:56 AM by ZakB
Filed under: , ,

Comments

simeon wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Wed, Oct 22 2008 7:17 AM

I just bought it last week. I've used it and it works great so far. But I'm still in the 'test"stages with it. I'll try some outdoor shots this weekend and really put it to the test

Lisa Neeb wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Wed, Oct 22 2008 7:38 AM

Does this work on the Nikon D40?

Peter wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Thu, Nov 6 2008 4:39 AM

itt will work on D40/40X/60 becouse it has an AF motor, DC type, not HSM, but it is OK. I tried it in Germany - Münster at Saturn.

But make a little research on Tamron website!  :D

Aditya C. Panda wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Thu, Nov 13 2008 3:41 PM

Has anyone tested this with a 2X TC? I'm wondering how the performance would be. Obviously AF will be slower, but has anyone noticed significant reduction in IQ and sharpness?

ZakB wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Fri, Nov 14 2008 9:35 AM

Aditya -

First of all, your wildlife photos are amazing. I know it takes not only a lot of skill, but also patience to get the shots you do. Well done.

As for a 2x teleconverter with this lens, I would think it would perform very well. I found this to be a very sharp lens, even wide open. The 2x converter would make it a 400mm f/5.6 wide open, not bad, but of course the sharpness would vary with your choice of teleconverter.

I did find this lens a tad slower to focus than my Canons. Probably this is due to lack of an ultrasonic focusing motor. But overall, it was more than adequate. I'd expect it to be a little slower with a 2x teleconverter, just because less light is getting in.

I did not test it with a teleconverter, unfortunately, so I'm only guessing. Unlike you, I don't spend my days sneaking up on birds and lions. But if sharpness is your thing, this is a fine lens.

Aditya C Panda wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Sat, Nov 15 2008 3:57 AM

Thanks for the kind words Zak. The worst thing about being a Pentaxian is that finding a lens can take weeks. Or months, as is my case. After three months of waiting and not finding satisfying compatible lenses, I have boiled down search to the following, in order of desirability:

Sigma 100-300 f/4 + 1.4X TC

Pentax DA* 300 f/4 + 1.4X TC

Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4X TC and 2X TC

In the worst case, if none of these are available immediately, Sigma 50-500 f/4-6.3, which I am very skeptical about as 1. its a superzoom and that HAS to have an effect on IQ, 2. I hear its not really 500mm and is actually only 460mm and that too at near infinity focus, 3. Its the same price as the lovely Pentax prime and the Sigma zoom mentioned above and is more expensive than the Tammy set up and 4. Although it will be a big leap as far as reach is concerned from my older Tamron 75-300 f/4-5.6, I doubt if it is any superior when image quality and sharpness are concerned. I'm ready to sacrifice 100mm at the long end for excellent IQ and sharpness.

What would you advise?

Cheers!

ZakB wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Mon, Nov 17 2008 4:34 PM

Aditya -

Check your email for a response.

-Zak

redwaters wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Mon, May 25 2009 6:08 PM

Isn't the lack of VC at long focal lengths a matter of concern.

ZakB wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Tue, May 26 2009 9:50 AM

VC (image stabilization) is always nice to have. Problem is, in this price range you're not going to get both the bright max aperture (f/2.8) and image stabilization in a lens. So what you're trading here is two extra stops of light at 200mm for image stabilization.

Personally, if my budget allowed only for one or the other, I'd take the f/2.8 aperture over the image stabilization. But that's a matter of preference, because I don't mind toting a monopod with a lens this size.

What this lens has to offer is (1) f/2.8 aperture, (2) great sharpness, and (3) macro capabilities (at 200mm) that are unmatched by other zoom lenses.

THA wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Tue, Jun 23 2009 1:43 AM

Does this work on the Nikon D5000?

ZakB wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Tue, Jun 23 2009 8:55 AM

THA - it'll work wonderfully on the D5000. Previous users have reported it working well with the D40.

DonF wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Thu, Jul 9 2009 10:23 AM

I was looking at this for my K10D. I shoot gymnastics and no flash allowed. Have you tried action shots in low light?

ZakB wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Thu, Jul 9 2009 11:21 AM

Don,

Depends on how the lighting is in the gym. Maybe go in there sometime with a lens you already have, open it up to f/2.8, and see what your camera's meter is telling you. You need really fast shutter speeds to shoot action.

Just a guess, but I suspect that you could probably use this lens to shoot the competition at ISO 800 and above.  I haven't had the pleasure of shooting with a K10D, does it do pretty well at ISO 1600?

Personally I'd grab a prime lens that can open up a bit more than f/2.8 for indoor sports. I'm not real familiar with the current Pentax lens lineup, but if they have an 85/1.8 or 100/2 or something like that it would probably give you better indoor sports shooting results. Might want a monopod, too.

DonF wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Fri, Jul 10 2009 10:48 AM

I currently have a standard Pentax lens 50-200 F4.0-5.6 and set it at 1600. It is is blured slightly during fast motion but I can rarely get it to 5.6 when zoomed in that's why I thought the 2.8 over the full length would work.

I will look at the Prime lenses but I'll probably have to buy two of them so I can get the close up and distance shots. You don't normally get to move around that's why I went with the zoom.

Thanks

Don

ZakB wrote re: Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 helps you see the light
on Fri, Jul 10 2009 11:11 AM

Don,

This Tamron is 2 full stops faster than your Pentax lens at 200mm. That will make a huge difference when light is at a premium.

The shutter speeds that are giving you blurry shots at f/5.6 will roughly quadruple at f/2.8. Check the EXIF data on some blurry shots for the shutter speed and multiply by 4. If that new number is fast enough to freeze action, say 1/500 and up, then this Tamron lens should work for you.

Zooms are convenient for changing focal lengths, but they're slower than primes. That's the tradeoff. If f/2.8 gets you there, this is a slick lens.

Add a Comment

(optional)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?